Debunking Myths: The Truth About Digital Motion X-ray (DMX)

Imagine watching a real-time X-ray video of your joints in motion. That's what Digital Motion X-ray (DMX) offers—a revolutionary way to view the mechanics of your body and identify subtle issues that traditional static images might miss. However, despite its groundbreaking capabilities, there are several misconceptions about DMX that we need to clear up. Let’s set the record straight... (Read More) 

Misconception 1: DMX is High Radiation Imaging

It’s a common concern to worry about radiation exposure, but DMX is designed to be a low-radiation imaging technology. Unlike some older imaging methods, DMX uses a very low dose of radiation, comparable to a 7-view traditional X-ray procedure. This design ensures that while you get detailed, real-time images, your exposure remains minimal.

Misconception 2: DMX Results are Unreliable

Some critics, particularly Independent Medical Examiners (IMEs), claim that DMX results are "inconclusive" or "arbitrary." This misunderstanding often arises because DMX is frequently confused with video fluoroscopy, which uses higher radiation and can blur images when movement occurs. Contrary to these claims, DMX provides approximately 2700 frames per scan with a radiation dose similar to a single X-ray. This comprehensive view allows for a detailed assessment of motion, providing valuable diagnostic information that’s been proven beneficial in court.

Misconception 3: DMX Does Not Impact Settlement Amounts

DMX has played a crucial role in securing substantial settlements across the nation. In many cases, DMX has been the key evidence demonstrating a genuine, permanent injury as per AMA guidelines. Despite insurance companies’ attempts to downplay DMX's impact, established legal precedents affirm its value in evaluating injuries related to ligament instability and conditions like CCI or AAI.

Misconception 4: DMX is Unregulated

Some believe that DMX is not regulated due to its relatively new status. This is not true. DMX, like all medical imaging devices, is subject to stringent federal regulations. For example, DMX operates at 1.99 roentgen per minute, well below the federal maximum of 4.60 roentgen per minute. Additionally, state regulations, such as those in Arizona, enforce strict licensing and safety standards to ensure quality and safety. At AZDMX, we adhere to all state regulations and maintain rigorous quality control measures.

Misconception 5: Lack of Scientific Studies

While research on DMX is still growing, there are significant studies and publications that recognize DMX as a gold standard for diagnosing instability. For instance, a 10-year instability study has praised DMX for its diagnostic accuracy. For more information and studies click here. 

Misconception 6: DMX is Incompatible with Imaging Standards

Some critics argue that DMX is incompatible with DICOM, which is commonly used for medical imaging. However, DICOM does not support true video but rather offers a slide-show-like simulation. At AZDMX, we use specialized calibrated software to ensure precise measurements and provide a detailed Mensuration report with every DMX scan. While DMX videos might not integrate seamlessly with all EHR systems, the essential data can be shared effectively through PDF reports.

Embracing the Potential of DMXDMX is not a replacement for traditional X-rays, MRIs, or CT scans but a complementary tool that enhances our diagnostic capabilities, especially in cases of instability. By debunking these myths, we can better appreciate the benefits DMX offers in improving patient care and supporting accurate diagnostics.

If you’re experiencing upper cervical pain or discomfort and are curious about how DMX can help, feel free to reach out to us. We’re here to answer any questions you, your doctor, or your attorney may have about DMX!