Turn “normal” scans into undeniable proof. DMX captures dynamic ligament damage that static MRI, CT, and X-rays miss — giving you objective evidence to maximize settlements in auto accidents, workers’ comp, and personal injury cases.
Call (855) 369-729119-year-old involved in SUV rollover. Static imaging showed nothing. DMX revealed severe ligament instability. Case settled for $750,000.
“Digital Motion X-Ray (DMX) helps attorneys take control of their depositions, arbitrations, mediations, and courtroom presentations by allowing them to objectively identify injuries that was never seen before!”
Static imaging frequently returns “normal” results even when patients have real pain and instability. DMX records real-time motion, revealing ligament laxity and AOMSI that insurance companies can no longer dismiss. Provides quantifiable data (e.g., >3.5 mm abnormal motion per AMA guidelines).
Attorneys using DMX routinely reach policy limits or higher. Clear, measurable evidence of permanent ligament damage strengthens negotiations and jury presentations. Helps counter lowball offers and “normal scan” defenses.
Take command with visual proof that is difficult to dispute. Strengthen depositions, mediations, arbitrations, and trials. Objective reports support AMA impairment ratings and future care needs.
Detailed 8–12 page analysis measuring every millimeter of ligament laxity. Trusted by physicians, attorneys, and insurance companies for objective documentation and AMA impairment ratings.
View Sample Mensuration Report →
Patients told their MRI/CT/X-rays were “normal.” DMX proved otherwise — turning weak claims into strong ones.
Comprehensive clinical guide used by physicians and attorneys to understand DMX findings, document ligamentous injuries, and support impairment ratings in personal injury cases.
Download the DMX Handbook →These Arizona firms have successfully used DMX in personal injury cases to document ligament injuries and strengthen client claims.
Lazzara Law Firm
Visit Website →Amara & Associates
Visit Website →Witson Law
Visit Website →Wood Injury Law
Visit Website →* These law firms have used DMX in past cases. They are not endorsing Arizona Digital Motion X-Ray and have no affiliation with us.
Yoshimoto H, et al. Kinematic evaluation of atlantoaxial joint instability: in vivo cineradiographic investigation. J Spinal Disord. 2001;14(1):21-31.
Hino H. Dynamic motion analysis of normal and unstable cervical spines using cineradiography. Spine. 1999;23:163-168.
Buonocore E. Cineradiograms of Cervical Spine in Diagnosis of Soft-tissue injuries. JAMA. 1966;198(1):25-29.
Shaff A. Video fluoroscopy as a method of detecting occipitoatlantal instability. Chiropractic Sports Medicine. 1994;8(4):144.
Betge G. The value of cineradiographic motion studies in diagnosis of dysfunctions of the cervical spine. Journal of Chiropractic. 1979;2(6):40-44.
Woesner M. The evaluation of cervical spine motion below C2. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1972;115:148-154.
Shippel A. Radiological and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of cervical spine instability. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1987;10(6).
Howe J. Preliminary observations from cineroentgenological studies of the spinal column. ACA Journal of Chiropractic. 1970;IV.
Robinson G.K. Cinefluoroscopic joint motion study of the post traumatic cervical spine. Digest of Chiropractic Economics. 1984;Nov/Dec:156-157.
Freeman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of videofluoroscopy for symptomatic cervical spine injury following whiplash trauma. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1693.
More Info |
Company |
|